Changing institutional landscapes for implementing wind power

Samenvatting

Table of Contents[-]Tables, figures, maps and annexes[-]Acknowledgements[-]1. Wind power in perspective: background and literature review[-] 1.1 Introduction and background on renewables[-] 1.1.1 Renewable energy sources[-] 1.1.2 Rise of environmental concern[-] 1.2 Diffusion of renewables: studies and approaches[-] 1.2.1 Policy support for renewables: studies and discussions[-] 1.2.2 Innovation systems approaches: diffusion of wind power technology[-] 1.2.3 Ecological modernisation: theory, discourse, and policy[-] 1.3 Planning for wind power: the local context[-] 1.3.1 Spatial planning domain[-] 1.3.2 Perceptions, attitudes and behaviour[-] 1.3.3 Local planning and project development approach[-] 1.4 Institutional capacity for wind power implementation[-]2. Theoretical considerations ... and conceptual framework[-] 2.1 Introduction[-] 2.2 New institutionalisms[-] 2.2.1 Three strands of new institutionalism[-] 2.2.2 Institutionalist approach in our research[-] 2.3 Theoretical frameworks on policy and planning[-] 2.4 Conceptual framework[-]3. Research method and design[-] 3.1 Introduction[-] 3.2 Multiple case study research[-] 3.3 Single cases and cross-comparison[-] 3.3.1 Single case studies[-] 3.3.2 Cross-comparison and conclusions[-] 3.4 Data and analysis[-] 3.5 Reliability and validity[-]4. Wind energy in the Netherlands[-] 4.1 Introduction[-] 4.2 Stories on wind power[-] 4.3 Domains: energy, planning and environment[-] 4.3.1 Energy domain[-] 4.3.2 Spatial planning domain[-] 4.3.3 Environmental policy domain[-] 4.3.4 Discussion: policy domains and policy framing[-] 4.4 Policy communities[-] 4.5 Changes in capacity building for wind energy[-]5. Wind energy in England[-] 5.1 Introduction[-] 5.2 Stories on wind[-] 5.3 Policy domains: energy, planning and environment[-] 5.3.1 Energy domain[-] 5.3.2 Spatial planning domain[-] 5.3.3 Environmental policy domain[-] 5.3.4 Discussion: three domains converging?[-] 5.4 Policy communities[-] 5.5 Institutional capacity building[-]6. Wind energy in North Rhine-Westphalia[-] 6.1 Introduction[-] 6.2 Stories on wind[-] 6.3 Policy domains: energy, planning and environment[-] 6.3.1 Energy domain[-] 6.3.2 Spatial planning domain[-] 6.3.3 Environmental policy domain[-] 6.3.4. Discussion: policy domains and policy framing[-] 6.4 Policy communities[-] 6.5 Institutional capacity building: losing touch[-]7. Identifying perspectives across cases[-] 7.1 Steps involved in Q sort analysis[-] 7.2 Four distinct views on wind power implementation[-] 7.3 Concluding remarks[-]8. Comparison on institutional capacity building[-] 8.1 Introduction[-] 8.2 Comparison of stories and relation to Q sort analysis[-] 8.2.1 Differences in stories among the cases[-] 8.3 Comparing arrangements in the policy domains[-] 8.3.1 Energy domain[-] 8.3.2 Planning domain[-] 8.3.3 Environmental policy domain[-] 8.3.4 Policy communities and mobilisation of support[-] 8.4 Conceptual framework and empirical inquiry[-]9. Institutionalising capacities for wind power implementation in changing contexts[-] 9.1 Introduction[-] 9.2 Conclusions on institutional capacity building[-] 9.3 Wider relevance of the conclusions[-] 9.4 Adopting a strategy of institutional capacity building[-]References[-]List of Abbreviations[-]Annex A Coded Arguments[-]Annex B Respondents[-]Annex C Q sort statements (randomly numbered)[-]Nederlandse samenvatting[-]Summary